I am always amazed
at this time of the year with all the gamers claiming to be
'professionals'.
For the vast
majority of gamers nothing could be further from the truth.
However, this year a
youngster bragged to me that 'gaming owes him a living'!
Really! How?
Nobody is owed
anything in this world unless there a clear indication/contract by
the other party that there some form of payment to be made in lieu of
services rendered.
The act of a person
who willingly becomes involved in a sport does not create that
contract, unless such person is employed to play for his/her
employer.
If there isn't a
contract stipulating employment, then that gamer is just an amateur.
That is if the gamer
is playing for a non profit organisation.
I am of the opinion
that due to the definition of the word 'remuneration' in the Basic
conditions of Employment Act, that gamers who are playing for
companies are being paid remuneration when they earn prizes of any
form. This has serious implications for the company and the gamer
alike.
Obviously the
company will have to comply fully with the Basic Conditions of
Employment Act.
For the gamer
though, it means that he/she will have to enter into a contract in
which his/her conditions of employment are stipulated.
Thus it stands to
reason that only the gamers that play for companies of a profit
making venture (like bvd, ventus, and the like) are proper
professional gamers and possibly entitled to all the benefits that
the Act allows.
Gamers who do not
receive remuneration for the gaming, however, are not professionals
and whether or not they earn prize money, are amateurs.
However, may be wrong, and if I am, I would like to know why.
However, may be wrong, and if I am, I would like to know why.